Mark A. Gill

59 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers

Mark A. Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Molecular Medicine 130
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 46
  • Pharmacology 352
  • Family Practice 16
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
Replace Torsten Hoppe‐Tichy with:
Torsten Hoppe‐Tichy Germany
Joseph F. Standing United Kingdom
Nicole Hunfeld Netherlands
Kyle Vance‐Bryan United States
Jaya Natarajan United States
Y. A. Hekster Netherlands
Athena F. Zuppa United States
Daniel P. Healy United States
Kurt A. Wargo United States
Peter Krüger Australia
Mark A. Gill relative to Torsten Hoppe‐Tichy Germany Torsten Hoppe‐Tichy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Torsten Hoppe‐Tichy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Gill. The network helps show where Mark A. Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Gill Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200099
2 200396
3 200150
4 199249
5 200548
6 199448
7 200543
8 200438
9 197935
10 199135
11 200333
12 198732
13 198327
14 200224
15 200221
16 199120
17 200816
18 200416
19 199215
20 198615

About Mark A. Gill

Mark A. Gill is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 60 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (30 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (9 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (6 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (130 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (46 citations), Pharmacology (352 citations), Family Practice (16 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations). Mark A. Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Stan G. Louie, Mark P. Okamoto, Alfred Chin, Paul M. Beringer, Bradley R. Williams, Jack W. Kern, Albert E. Yellin, David A. Sclar, Kazuhiro Inagaki and Peter N.R. Heseltine. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact