Mark A. Booth

56 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Mark A. Booth's Hit Papers

A feed is only as good as its ingredients ? a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds 2007 · 654 citations
6540+6+12Years since publication200400600

Peers

Mark A. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Aquatic Science 2.2k
  • Immunology 185
  • Ecology 135
  • Animal Science and Zoology 43
  • Physiology 14
Replace Dalton José Carneiro with:
Dalton José Carneiro Brazil
David A.J. Stone Australia
Miguel Angel Olvera-Novoa Mexico
C.Y. Cho Canada
Sona Yengkokpam India
Rodrigo O. A. Ozório Portugal
Cedric J. Simon Australia
Seunghan Lee South Korea
Daniel Lemos Brazil
Mark A. Booth relative to Dalton José Carneiro Brazil Dalton José Carneiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Dalton José Carneiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Booth. The network helps show where Mark A. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A feed is only as good as its ingredients ? a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds
Hit paper breakdown →
2007654
2 2000241
3 2001120
4 201886
5 201077
6 200474
7 200873
8 200467
9 200661
10 201261
11 200959
12 201353
13 200049
14 201843
15 200339
16 202037
17 200836
18 200235
19
Aquaculture Diet Development Subprogram: Ingredient Evaluation
200335
20 200835

About Mark A. Booth

Mark A. Booth is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Ecology, Immunology, Analytical Chemistry and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (53 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (2.2k citations), Immunology (185 citations), Ecology (135 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (43 citations) and Physiology (14 citations). Mark A. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Geoff L. Allan, Brett D. Glencross, Igor Pirozzi, Scott Parkinson, Jane Frances, David A.J. Stone, D. Stewart Fielder, Stuart J. Rowland, Paul L. Jones and Richard P. Smullen. Their work appears in journals such as Aquaculture, Aquaculture Nutrition, Animal Feed Science and Technology, Aquaculture International and Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact