Mark A. Bisby

6.5k citations
105 papers · 5.5k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Mark A. Bisby

105 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Mark A. Bisby
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.7k
  • Physiology 1.9k
  • Neurology 883
  • Neurology 398
Replace Robert A. Rush with:
Robert A. Rush Australia
Graham P. Wilkin United Kingdom
Paul N. Hoffman United States
Alfredo Gorio Italy
R M Lindsay United Kingdom
Gong Ju China
Carey Backus United States
Ian A. Hendry Australia
Claude Gravel Canada
Stanley M. Crain United States
Mark A. Bisby relative to Robert A. Rush Australia Robert A. Rush's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Robert A. Rush · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Bisby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Bisby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Bisby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Bisby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Bisby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Bisby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Bisby. The network helps show where Mark A. Bisby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Bisby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Bisby Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Bisby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991419
2 1989180
3 1988175
4 1999170
5 1989166
6 1989163
7 1988151
8 1998145
9 1992143
10 1998137
11 1997136
12 1997136
13 1998133
14 1990129
15 1973117
16 1977117
17 1990109
18 1990107
19 1997104
20 199699

About Mark A. Bisby

Mark A. Bisby is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (64 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (29 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (20 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (19 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (16 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (6 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (5 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.7k citations), Physiology (1.9k citations), Neurology (883 citations) and Neurology (398 citations). Mark A. Bisby has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wolfram Tetzlaff, Matt S. Ramer, Weiya Ma, W Ma, Catharine C. Ferri, P. M. Richardson, P. Keen, PM Richardson, Kreutzberg Gw and Marianne Fillenz. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact