Margit Kempf

976 citations
30 papers · 743 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Biomaterials top 10%
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
    • Silk-based biomaterials and applications

Papers in

Margit Kempf

28 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Margit Kempf
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Rehabilitation 368
  • Biomaterials 167
  • Dermatology 99
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Urology 29
Replace Xanthe L. Strudwick with:
Xanthe L. Strudwick Australia
Roxanne Parungao Australia
Marcel Vlig Netherlands
Nicholas S. Greaves United Kingdom
Ben‐Shian Huang Taiwan
Elizabeth Kiwanuka United States
Britani N. Blackstone United States
Jaromír Sláma United States
Jörg Hauser Germany
E. Freedlander United Kingdom
Margit Kempf relative to Xanthe L. Strudwick Australia Xanthe L. Strudwick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Xanthe L. Strudwick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margit Kempf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margit Kempf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margit Kempf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margit Kempf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margit Kempf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margit Kempf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margit Kempf. The network helps show where Margit Kempf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Margit Kempf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Margit Kempf Line = papers co-authored together Margit Kempf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005155
2 2006135
3 201181
4 200873
5 201153
6 201447
7 200944
8 200938
9 201825
10 201624
11 201715
12 200911
13 20088
14 20158
15 20175
16 20084
17 20043
18
Collagen in the scarless fetal skin wound
20043
19 20052
20
Collagen deposition assessment in burn scar tissue using second harmonic generation and multi-photon microscopy
20101

About Margit Kempf

Margit Kempf is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Insect Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (24 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (14 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (3 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (2 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (2 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (368 citations), Biomaterials (167 citations), Dermatology (99 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations) and Urology (29 citations). Margit Kempf has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Thailand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy Kimble, Leila Cuttle, Mark Hayes, John F. Fraser, Julie Mill, Maria Nataatmadja, Gael E. Phillips, Olena Kravchuk, Xueqing Wang and Christine Andrews. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Wound Repair and Regeneration, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Burn Care & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact