Leila Cuttle
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 50
- Epidemiology 44
- Burn Injury Management and Outcomes 44
- Co-authors
- Roy Kimble (61 shared papers)Margit Kempf (27 shared papers)Julie Mill (14 shared papers)Glenda C. Gobé (8 shared papers)John F. Fraser (6 shared papers)Mark Hayes (5 shared papers)Zoltán Endre (6 shared papers)Olena Kravchuk (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- Burns (27 papers)Wound Repair and Regeneration (11 papers)Journal of Burn Care & Research (5 papers)Trials (3 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Leila Cuttle
87 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Rehabilitation 704
- Epidemiology 635
- Occupational Therapy 76
- Dermatology 153
- Biomaterials 180
Countries citing papers authored by Leila Cuttle
This map shows the geographic impact of Leila Cuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leila Cuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leila Cuttle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leila Cuttle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leila Cuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leila Cuttle. The network helps show where Leila Cuttle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leila Cuttle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 132 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 117 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 114 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 96 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 86 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 72 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 71 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 44 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 36 |
About Leila Cuttle
Leila Cuttle is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Surgery, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (50 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (44 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (6 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (5 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (5 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (4 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (704 citations), Epidemiology (635 citations), Occupational Therapy (76 citations), Dermatology (153 citations) and Biomaterials (180 citations). Leila Cuttle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roy Kimble, Margit Kempf, Julie Mill, Glenda C. Gobé, John F. Fraser, Mark Hayes, Zoltán Endre, Olena Kravchuk, David W. Johnson and Maria Nataatmadja. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Wound Repair and Regeneration, Journal of Burn Care & Research, Trials and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.