Marek Pycia

2.0k citations
58 papers · 977 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Marek Pycia

52 papers receiving 939 citations

Peers

Marek Pycia
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Management Science and Operations Research 643
  • General Decision Sciences 58
  • Economics and Econometrics 632
  • Marketing 183
  • Safety Research 136
Replace Eduardo M. Azevedo with:
Eduardo M. Azevedo United States
Lars Ehlers Canada
Vijay Krishna United States
Mamoru Kaneko Japan
Alex Gershkov Israel
Avinatan Hassidim Israel
Ronald Peeters Netherlands
Emmanuel Guerre France
Frédéric Koessler France
Yukihiko Funaki Japan
Marek Pycia relative to Eduardo M. Azevedo United States Eduardo M. Azevedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eduardo M. Azevedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marek Pycia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marek Pycia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marek Pycia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marek Pycia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marek Pycia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marek Pycia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marek Pycia. The network helps show where Marek Pycia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marek Pycia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marek Pycia Line = papers co-authored together Marek Pycia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014215
2 201299
3 200280
4 201777
5 201164
6 201737
7 201433
8 201825
9 201125
10 201619
11 201519
12 201418
13
Stochastic vs Deterministic Mechanisms in Multidimensional Screening
200618
14 201017
15 202315
16 201615
17 201514
18 200113
19 201413
20 201112

About Marek Pycia

Marek Pycia is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Political Science and International Relations and Applied Mathematics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (40 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (30 papers), Economic theories and models (18 papers), Game Theory and Applications (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (643 citations), General Decision Sciences (58 citations), Economics and Econometrics (632 citations), Marketing (183 citations) and Safety Research (136 citations). Marek Pycia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include M. Utku Ünver, Peter Cramton, Marzena Rostek, Marek Weretka, Roland Bénabou, Qingmin Liu, M. Bumin Yenmez, Peter Troyan, Simon Board and Antonio Miralles. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Economic Studies, American Economic Journal Microeconomics, Econometrica, Aequationes Mathematicae and International Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact