Marek Osacký

23 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Marek Osacký
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Analytical Chemistry 86
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 68
  • Inorganic Chemistry 88
  • Biomaterials 80
  • Ocean Engineering 85
Replace Lenka Vaculíková with:
Lenka Vaculíková Czechia
Abdelaziz Khlaifat Egypt
Eva Plevová Czechia
Enid J. Sullivan United States
Hongliang Li China
Brian K. Schroth United States
Pil Soo Hahn South Korea
Zhifen Wang China
J. L. Mogollón Venezuela
Marek Osacký relative to Lenka Vaculíková Czechia Lenka Vaculíková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Lenka Vaculíková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marek Osacký

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marek Osacký's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marek Osacký with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marek Osacký more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marek Osacký

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marek Osacký. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marek Osacký. The network helps show where Marek Osacký may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marek Osacký, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marek Osacký Line = papers co-authored together Marek Osacký links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201359
2 201237
3 201534
4 201034
5 201633
6 201226
7 201625
8 201922
9 200921
10 201319
11 202118
12 201413
13 201011
14 201710
15 20228
16 20197
17 20135
18 20125
19 20234
20 20123

About Marek Osacký

Marek Osacký is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering, Analytical Chemistry and Ocean Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clay minerals and soil interactions (12 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (8 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (6 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (5 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (5 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (5 papers), Building materials and conservation (2 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (86 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (68 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (88 citations), Biomaterials (80 citations) and Ocean Engineering (85 citations). Marek Osacký has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Canada and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas G. Ivey, Qi Liu, Thomas H. Etsell, Jana Madejová, Adriana Czı́merová, V. Šucha, Michal Galamboš, O. Rosskopfová, P. Rajec and Martina Vítková. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Clay Science, Energy & Fuels, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials and Environmental Earth Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact