Applied Clay Science

6.8k papers and 247.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.8k papers published in Applied Clay Science in the last decades have received a total of 247.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Clay Science usually cover Biomaterials (2.6k papers), Materials Chemistry (2.1k papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Clay minerals and soil interactions (2.4k papers), Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications (1.1k papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Clay Science are Philippe Lebaron, Haydn H. Murray, Jeffrey W. Gilman, G. Lagaly, Marı́a Isabel Carretero, Angelo Vaccari, Chun Hui Zhou, Krishna G. Bhattacharyya, Huaming Yang and Peng Yuan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Clay Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Clay Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Clay Science.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Clay Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Clay Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Clay Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Clay Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025