Mao‐Ling Wei

977 citations
20 papers · 778 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Papers in

Mao‐Ling Wei

20 papers receiving 750 citations

Peers

Mao‐Ling Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ophthalmology 147
  • Pharmacology 159
  • Hepatology 35
  • Oncology 66
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 48
Replace Weizhong Zhang with:
Weizhong Zhang China
İsmail Şimşek Türkiye
Akiko Adachi Japan
Theo Klotz Germany
Alberto Alonso-Ruiz Spain
Ulrik Mouritzen Denmark
Jiao Wang China
Mao‐Ling Wei relative to Weizhong Zhang China Weizhong Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.7×
Weizhong Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mao‐Ling Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mao‐Ling Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mao‐Ling Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mao‐Ling Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mao‐Ling Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mao‐Ling Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mao‐Ling Wei. The network helps show where Mao‐Ling Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mao‐Ling Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mao‐Ling Wei Line = papers co-authored together Mao‐Ling Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2012210
2 2007115
3 201173
4 200653
5 201541
6 200740
7 200839
8
Green tea and gastric cancer risk: meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.
200838
9 200927
10 200825
11 200923
12 200922
13 201619
14
Clinical evidence of growth hormone, glutamine and a modified diet for short bowel syndrome: meta-analysis of clinical trials.
200513
15 20059
16 20109
17
Structured triglyceride for parenteral nutrition: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
20067
18 20087
19 20217
20 20011

About Mao‐Ling Wei

Mao‐Ling Wei is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (2 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper) and Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (147 citations), Pharmacology (159 citations), Hepatology (35 citations), Oncology (66 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (48 citations). Mao‐Ling Wei has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Liang Du, Yong Zhou, Xun Yao, Xiaoting Wu, Taixiang Wu, Wen Zhuang, Xiaoming Chen, Ni Li, Guanjian Liu and Li Ni. Their work appears in journals such as Digestive Diseases and Sciences, European Journal of Cancer, Clinical Biochemistry, Ophthalmology and The International Journal of Biological Markers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact