Manuela Stets

453 citations
15 papers · 320 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Manuela Stets

14 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Manuela Stets
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 157
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 201
  • Pharmacy 34
  • Social Psychology 94
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
Replace Kirsty Dunn with:
Kirsty Dunn United Kingdom
Isabelle Carchon France
Helga O. Miguel United States
Olga Kochukhova Sweden
Arnaud Witt France
Marie Avril France
Josette Serres France
Evelin Bertin United States
Nicole Altvater‐Mackensen Germany
Ermanno Quadrelli Italy
Manuela Stets relative to Kirsty Dunn United Kingdom Kirsty Dunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Kirsty Dunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Stets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Stets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Stets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Stets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Stets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Stets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Stets. The network helps show where Manuela Stets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Manuela Stets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manuela Stets Line = papers co-authored together Manuela Stets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201299
2 200954
3 200847
4 201034
5 201530
6 202016
7 201611
8 201910
9 20227
10 20234
11 20134
12 20242
13 20241
14 20251
15 20240

About Manuela Stets

Manuela Stets is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Infant Health and Development (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (157 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (201 citations), Pharmacy (34 citations), Social Psychology (94 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations). Manuela Stets has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vincent M. Reid, Daniel Ståhl, Tricia Striano, Eugenio Parise, Masako Hirotani, Angela D. Friederici, Silvia Rigato, Karla Holmboe, Christine Michel and Stefanie Hoehl. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, NeuroImage, Frontiers in Psychology, Social Neuroscience and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact