Manuela Scali

456 citations
12 papers · 355 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Manuela Scali

12 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Manuela Scali
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Developmental Neuroscience 47
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 144
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 101
  • Neurology 39
Replace André O. White with:
André O. White United States
Jessica M. Fawcett‐Patel United States
Erica J. Young United States
Sarah Luo United States
Shovan Naskar Italy
Xinlu Ding United States
Eleonora Centofante Italy
Xinjun Wang China
Anes Ju South Korea
Edward B. Han United States
Manuela Scali relative to André O. White United States André O. White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
André O. White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Scali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Scali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Scali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Scali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Scali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Scali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Scali. The network helps show where Manuela Scali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Manuela Scali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manuela Scali Line = papers co-authored together Manuela Scali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201081
2 200963
3 201646
4 201235
5 201831
6 202123
7 201320
8 201817
9 201814
10 200610
11 20089
12 20146

About Manuela Scali

Manuela Scali is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (47 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (144 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations) and Neurology (39 citations). Manuela Scali has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tommaso Pizzorusso, Alessandro Sale, Davide Silingardi, Laura Baroncelli, Lamberto Maffei, Yuri Bozzi, Gabriele Sansevero, Simona Casarosa, Marco Mainardi and Prem Prakash Tripathi. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Neuropharmacology, Neuroscience, Experimental Gerontology and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact