Man‐Man Peng

466 citations
26 papers · 322 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Family Caregiving in Mental Illness 8
    • Health and Well-being Studies 2
    • Health disparities and outcomes 8

Man‐Man Peng

24 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Man‐Man Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Clinical Psychology 170
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
  • Social Psychology 94
  • Health 20
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
Replace Fang‐pei Chen with:
Fang‐pei Chen United States
Stelios Stylianidis Greece
Mithila Mahesh Singapore
Harald Zäske Germany
Simon Vasseur Bacle Switzerland
Tuğba Türk Kurtça Türkiye
Małgorzata Woźniak‐Prus Poland
Kris Goethals Belgium
Mary Barnao New Zealand
Kelly Dundon United States
Man‐Man Peng relative to Fang‐pei Chen United States Fang‐pei Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Fang‐pei Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Man‐Man Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Man‐Man Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Man‐Man Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Man‐Man Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Man‐Man Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Man‐Man Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Man‐Man Peng. The network helps show where Man‐Man Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Man‐Man Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Man‐Man Peng Line = papers co-authored together Man‐Man Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202243
2 201841
3 202235
4 202031
5 201928
6 202226
7 201923
8 201922
9 202116
10 201811
11 20237
12 20226
13 20205
14 20234
15 20224
16 20234
17 20223
18 20213
19 20242
20 20242

About Man‐Man Peng

Man‐Man Peng is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (170 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations), Social Psychology (94 citations), Health (20 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations). Man‐Man Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mao‐Sheng Ran, Clw Chan, Zhiying Ma, Yuehui Yu, Wei Luo, Rth Ho, Qingsong Chang, Ko Ling Chan, Graham Thornicroft and Dannuo Wei. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Psychiatry, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Innovation in Aging, BJPsych Open and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact