André Mata

56 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

André Mata
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Decision Sciences 253
  • Social Psychology 231
  • Family Practice 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
Replace David B. Centerbar with:
David B. Centerbar United States
Leonel Garcia‐Marques Portugal
Catherine E. Seta United States
Patrice Rusconi Italy
Lara K. Kammrath United States
Randall E. Osborne United States
Jozef Bavoľár Slovakia
Sarah Emlen Metz United States
Amy Marcus‐Newhall United States
Annika M. Svedholm‐Häkkinen Finland
André Mata relative to David B. Centerbar United States David B. Centerbar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
David B. Centerbar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by André Mata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of André Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Mata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by André Mata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Mata. The network helps show where André Mata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside André Mata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with André Mata Line = papers co-authored together André Mata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004262
2 201375
3 201940
4 201333
5 201631
6 201429
7 202329
8 201727
9 202021
10 201418
11 201617
12 201516
13 201916
14 201315
15 202115
16 201914
17 201413
18 201612
19 202011
20 202211

About André Mata

André Mata is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Family Practice, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (29 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (253 citations), Social Psychology (231 citations), Family Practice (24 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations). André Mata has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mário B. Ferreira, Steven J. Sherman, Anna‐Lena Schubert, Cláudia Simão, Hans Alves, Klaus Fiedler, Andreas Voß, Leonel Garcia‐Marques, Ana Rita Farias and Chris Donkin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognition, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Social Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact