André Mata
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 23
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 18
- Memory Processes and Influences 4
- Co-authors
- Mário B. Ferreira (19 shared papers)Steven J. Sherman (8 shared papers)Cláudia Simão (6 shared papers)Anna‐Lena Schubert (2 shared papers)Hans Alves (4 shared papers)Klaus Fiedler (2 shared papers)Andreas Voß (1 shared paper)Ana Rita Farias (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Social Cognition (6 papers)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (4 papers)Social Psychology (4 papers)Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (3 papers)Cognition (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
André Mata
53 papers receiving 544 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- General Decision Sciences 213
- Applied Psychology 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 214
- Safety Research 95
- Social Psychology 137
Countries citing papers authored by André Mata
This map shows the geographic impact of André Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Mata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by André Mata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Mata. The network helps show where André Mata may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside André Mata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 10 |
About André Mata
André Mata is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (23 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (23 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (213 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations), Safety Research (95 citations) and Social Psychology (137 citations). André Mata has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mário B. Ferreira, Steven J. Sherman, Cláudia Simão, Anna‐Lena Schubert, Hans Alves, Klaus Fiedler, Andreas Voß, Ana Rita Farias, Leonel Garcia‐Marques and Chris Donkin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognition, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.