Malcolm Miles

1.5k citations
71 papers · 930 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Miles

58 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Malcolm Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Urban Studies 413
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 124
  • Museology 83
  • Geography, Planning and Development 79
  • Literature and Literary Theory 108
Replace Ben Highmore with:
Ben Highmore United Kingdom
Rosalind Williams United States
Robert Hewison United Kingdom
Carolyn J. Dean United States
Jennifer Craik Australia
Joe Moran United Kingdom
Steven Hoelscher United States
Robert W. Rydell United States
Shelly Errington United States
Malcolm Miles relative to Ben Highmore United Kingdom Ben Highmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Ben Highmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Miles. The network helps show where Malcolm Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Miles Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005170
2 198176
3 200463
4 201061
5 200760
6
The City Cultures Reader
200043
7 200539
8 201437
9 198137
10 200434
11
Urban Utopias: The Built and Social Architectures of Alternative Settlements
200728
12
Urban futures : critical commentaries on shaping the city
200327
13 198119
14 197919
15 200719
16 201315
17 199715
18 200011
19 201511
20 200711

About Malcolm Miles

Malcolm Miles is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 71 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (11 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (11 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), Public Spaces through Art (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (2 papers), Architecture and Cultural Influences (2 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (413 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (124 citations), Museology (83 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (79 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (108 citations). Malcolm Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Steven Miles, RoseLee Goldberg, Tim Hall, Iain Borden, Arnold Weinstein, John Ashbery, Nick Bentley, James R. Giles, Antonis Balasopoulos and Rob Latham. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Interventions, Journal of Visual Art Practice, URBAN DESIGN International and Cultural Politics an International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact