Malcolm Ashmore

21 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Malcolm Ashmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • General Psychology 33
  • History and Philosophy of Science 82
  • Language and Linguistics 136
  • Literature and Literary Theory 101
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 92
Replace Christine Brooke‐Rose with:
Christine Brooke‐Rose United Kingdom
Wilhelm Dilthey
Christopher Norris United Kingdom
Jim Garrison United States
Bruce Wilshire United States
Patricia Ticineto Clough United States
Donald A. Nielsen United States
José Ortéga y Gassét Venezuela
Adam Kuper Netherlands
Louis Menand United States
Malcolm Ashmore relative to Christine Brooke‐Rose United Kingdom Christine Brooke‐Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Christine Brooke‐Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Ashmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Ashmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Ashmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Ashmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Ashmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Ashmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Ashmore. The network helps show where Malcolm Ashmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Ashmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Ashmore Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Ashmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995231
2
The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
1989211
3 199368
4
Health and efficiency : a sociology of health economics
198960
5 200560
6 199340
7 198729
8 200328
9 199425
10 199622
11 198722
12 199622
13 199413
14 199911
15 200411
16 198511
17 20007
18 19943
19 20053
20 19952

About Malcolm Ashmore

Malcolm Ashmore is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, General Health Professions and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 22 papers that have together received 881 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (1 paper), Violence, Religion, and Philosophy (1 paper) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (33 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (82 citations), Language and Linguistics (136 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (101 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (92 citations). Malcolm Ashmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Derek Edwards, Jonathan Potter, Trevor Pinch, Darren Reed, Andrew Pickering, Michael Mulkay, Steven D. Brown, Katie MacMillan, Evelleen Richards and Robin Wooffitt. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, History of the Human Sciences, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, South Atlantic Quarterly and Journal of Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact