Malcolm A. Faers

778 citations
23 papers · 640 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm A. Faers

23 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

Malcolm A. Faers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Molecular Medicine 51
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 64
  • Materials Chemistry 322
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 45
  • Organic Chemistry 181
Replace R. Vavrin with:
R. Vavrin Switzerland
Panayiotis Voudouris Netherlands
Florian Nettesheim United States
Andreas S. Poulos France
Davide C. E. Calzolari Switzerland
H. Stettin Germany
Kenneth Wong Switzerland
Yebang Tan China
A. Pouchelon France
Jean Michel Guenet France
Malcolm A. Faers relative to R. Vavrin Switzerland R. Vavrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
R. Vavrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm A. Faers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm A. Faers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm A. Faers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm A. Faers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm A. Faers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm A. Faers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm A. Faers. The network helps show where Malcolm A. Faers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm A. Faers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm A. Faers Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm A. Faers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201068
2 201362
3 201461
4 201261
5 199444
6 200938
7 202135
8 199735
9 199931
10 200829
11 200626
12 199925
13 201124
14 198719
15 202215
16 201913
17 201713
18 200312
19 201811
20 20188

About Malcolm A. Faers

Malcolm A. Faers is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Material Dynamics and Properties (10 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (9 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (6 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (3 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (2 papers) and Coagulation and Flocculation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (51 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (64 citations), Materials Chemistry (322 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (45 citations) and Organic Chemistry (181 citations). Malcolm A. Faers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Paul D. Bartlett, Paul F. Luckham, Jeroen S. van Duijneveldt, C. Patrick Royall, James E. Hallett, James W. Goodwin, Richard Buscall, Susan Partridge, Arnoldus W. P. Vermeer and Kevin H. McAllister. Their work appears in journals such as Soft Matter, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Pest Management Science and Langmuir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact