Robert L. Jack

5.6k citations
127 papers · 3.5k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Robert L. Jack

119 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Robert L. Jack
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.3k
  • Ophthalmology 291
  • Materials Chemistry 1.4k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 798
Replace Roberto Di Leonardo with:
Roberto Di Leonardo Italy
Ralph Nossal United States
Hans De Raedt Netherlands
K. M. Leung United States
M. Cristina Marchetti United States
Joan Adler Israel
Marek Cieplak Poland
W. Ertmer Germany
Joseph W. Haus United States
Ben O’Shaughnessy United States
Robert L. Jack relative to Roberto Di Leonardo Italy Roberto Di Leonardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.4×
Roberto Di Leonardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Jack. The network helps show where Robert L. Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert L. Jack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert L. Jack Line = papers co-authored together Robert L. Jack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009283
2 2007271
3 2009208
4 2014173
5 2019105
6 200797
7 202194
8 201588
9 202084
10 201574
11 201473
12 201666
13 201966
14 200566
15 201661
16 200861
17 200660
18 197459
19 202056
20 200652

About Robert L. Jack

Robert L. Jack is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Ophthalmology, having authored 127 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Material Dynamics and Properties (51 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (49 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (45 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (19 papers), Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (11 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (9 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (9 papers) and Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.5k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (1.3k citations), Ophthalmology (291 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.4k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (798 citations). Robert L. Jack has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Juan P. Garrahan, David Chandler, Vivien Lecomte, Ludovic Berthier, Frédéric van Wijland, Kristina van Duijvendijk, Stephen Whitelam, Lester O. Hedges, Peter Sollich and Estelle Pitard. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. E, Soft Matter and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact