Mabel Lie

31 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Mabel Lie
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 19
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 78
  • Demography 127
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 52
Replace Lynn Jackson with:
Lynn Jackson United States
Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza Australia
Dorina Simeonov Canada
Jovana Todorović Serbia
Rachel Pozzar United States
Inger Lindberg Sweden
Cathy Roche United States
Valerie Chan Singapore
Yvonne D. Eaves United States
Richard Osborn Canada
Mabel Lie relative to Lynn Jackson United States Lynn Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Lynn Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Lie. The network helps show where Mabel Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mabel Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mabel Lie Line = papers co-authored together Mabel Lie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201395
2 201354
3 201047
4 200946
5 201941
6 201531
7 200726
8 201222
9 202120
10 202012
11 20149
12 20188
13
Volunteering, self-help and citizenship in later life
20047
14 20146
15 20186
16 20175
17 20185
18 20115
19
Methodological Issues in Qualitative Research with Minority Ethnic Research Participants
20065
20 20214

About Mabel Lie

Mabel Lie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Demography, having authored 36 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (2 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (19 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (78 citations), Demography (127 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (52 citations). Mabel Lie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Susan Baines, Katie Brittain, Stephen Lindsay, Jane Wheelock, Carl May, Nick Lewis‐Barned, Ruth Bell, Louise Hayes, Martin White and Stephen C. Robson. Their work appears in journals such as Ageing and Society, Women s Studies International Forum, Sociology of Health & Illness, Health Technology Assessment and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact