M. Weis
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Papers in
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 2
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 1
- Co-authors
- Frederick S. Mikelberg (1 shared paper)Michael Schulzer (1 shared paper)Stephen M. Drance (1 shared paper)Thomas Rechlin (2 shared papers)Wolfgang P. Kaschka (1 shared paper)D. Claus (4 shared papers)Herbert Feistel (1 shared paper)Hermann Stefan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Psychiatry (1 paper)Ophthalmology (1 paper)Intensive Care Medicine (1 paper)Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (1 paper)Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. Weis
7 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Ophthalmology 150
- Neurology 22
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 58
- Neurology 29
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 36
Countries citing papers authored by M. Weis
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Weis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Weis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Weis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Weis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Weis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Weis. The network helps show where M. Weis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside M. Weis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 231 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 1 |
About M. Weis
M. Weis is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 8 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (150 citations), Neurology (22 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (58 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (36 citations). M. Weis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frederick S. Mikelberg, Michael Schulzer, Stephen M. Drance, Thomas Rechlin, Wolfgang P. Kaschka, D. Claus, Herbert Feistel, Hermann Stefan, A. Spitzer and B. Neundörfer. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Ophthalmology, Intensive Care Medicine, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.