M. van Dijk
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 3
- Management of metastatic bone disease 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 5
- Co-authors
- P. Wuisman (8 shared papers)F. Cumhur Öner (2 shared papers)Diederik H.R. Kempen (2 shared papers)Joost Rutges (1 shared paper)Wim Meeus (4 shared papers)Susan Branje (4 shared papers)Theo H. Smit (4 shared papers)Evelyn H. Kroesbergen (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Spine Journal (4 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Zeitschrift für Psychologie (1 paper)Orthopedics (1 paper)Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyNorway
In The Last Decade
M. van Dijk
23 papers receiving 812 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
- Applied Psychology 40
- Surgery 276
- Hematology 73
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by M. van Dijk
This map shows the geographic impact of M. van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. van Dijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. van Dijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. van Dijk. The network helps show where M. van Dijk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. van Dijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 157 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 8 |
About M. van Dijk
M. van Dijk is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Surgery (276 citations), Hematology (73 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (69 citations). M. van Dijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Norway. Frequent co-authors include P. Wuisman, F. Cumhur Öner, Diederik H.R. Kempen, Joost Rutges, Wim Meeus, Susan Branje, Theo H. Smit, Evelyn H. Kroesbergen, William W. Hale and Skyler T. Hawk. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Orthopedics and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.