M. Spajer

1.6k citations
47 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

M. Spajer

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

M. Spajer
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 754
  • Biomedical Engineering 901
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 110
  • Biophysics 86
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 723
Replace R. L. Kostelak with:
R. L. Kostelak United States
Sylvain Lecler France
Janne Simonen Finland
A. Muray United States
Andreas Huber Germany
J.‐C. Weeber France
Brian K. Canfield United States
Martin Salt Switzerland
Nicholaos I. Limberopoulos United States
Chusuke Munakata Japan
M. Spajer relative to R. L. Kostelak United States R. L. Kostelak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. L. Kostelak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Spajer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Spajer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Spajer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Spajer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Spajer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Spajer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Spajer. The network helps show where M. Spajer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Spajer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Spajer Line = papers co-authored together M. Spajer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989271
2 2002163
3 1990116
4 2004102
5 199655
6 199852
7 200936
8 199235
9 199034
10 199930
11 198622
12 199620
13 200018
14 200016
15 199814
16 199813
17 198113
18 199513
19 200112
20 199712

About M. Spajer

M. Spajer is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Materials Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Near-Field Optical Microscopy (31 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (21 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (5 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (4 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (4 papers) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (754 citations), Biomedical Engineering (901 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (110 citations), Biophysics (86 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (723 citations). M. Spajer has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include D. Courjon, Khaled Sarayeddine, Thierry Grosjean, C. Bainier, J. M. Vigoureux, Christian Girard, Nadège Courjal, M.P. Bernal, Andreï Sabac and Dominique Barchiesi. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Optics Communications, Applied Surface Science, Ultramicroscopy and Journal of Microscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact