M. Smith‐Barbour

623 citations
13 papers · 566 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M. Smith‐Barbour

13 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

M. Smith‐Barbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Physiology 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 252
  • Neurology 93
  • Developmental Neuroscience 32
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 28
Replace Sylvie Duflot with:
Sylvie Duflot Spain
D. Song United States
Richard E. Simpson United States
Yinquan Fang China
Elizabeth Walker New Zealand
Samaneh Maysami United Kingdom
K. Collier United States
Francisco J. Ortega Spain
Stéphanie Goursaud Belgium
Daqing Liao China
M. Smith‐Barbour relative to Sylvie Duflot Spain Sylvie Duflot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Sylvie Duflot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Smith‐Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Smith‐Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Smith‐Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Smith‐Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Smith‐Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Smith‐Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Smith‐Barbour. The network helps show where M. Smith‐Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside M. Smith‐Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Smith‐Barbour Line = papers co-authored together M. Smith‐Barbour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1994130
2 1998123
3 199577
4 199455
5 199644
6 199537
7 199330
8 199422
9 199417
10 199312
11 19939
12 19947
13
Lysyl oxidase transcripts in peritoneal adhesions and incisional scars.
19993

About M. Smith‐Barbour

M. Smith‐Barbour is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (2 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (2 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (84 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (252 citations), Neurology (93 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (32 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (28 citations). M. Smith‐Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John W. Phillis, Michael H. O’Regan, Louise M. Perkins, Richard E. Leach, Michael P. Diamond, Elizabeth Dawe, James W. Burns, Yuval Yaron, Susan M. Wykes and Stephen A. Krawetz. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Neurochemical Research, Fertility and Sterility, Life Sciences and Journal of Neurochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact