M Slater

653 citations
30 papers · 417 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M Slater

28 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

M Slater
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Algebra and Number Theory 187
  • Geometry and Topology 132
  • Applied Mathematics 101
  • Numerical Analysis 45
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 24
Replace John Loxton with:
John Loxton Australia
Marlow Sholander United States
C.S. Ballantine United States
Arne Stray Norway
Binyamin Schwarz Israel
H. S. Bear United States
Mary R. Embry United States
Taqdir Husain Canada
P. T. Church United States
Mieczysław Altman United States
M Slater relative to John Loxton Australia John Loxton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
John Loxton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Slater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Slater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Slater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Slater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Slater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Slater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Slater. The network helps show where M Slater may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside M Slater, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Slater Line = papers co-authored together M Slater links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196048
2 197340
3 198134
4 196430
5 196826
6 197025
7 196724
8 197920
9 196718
10 196917
11 197015
12 197514
13 196813
14 197312
15 196711
16 195111
17 19699
18 19717
19
The analysis of one-dimensional linear cellular automata theiraliasing properties
20067
20 19706

About M Slater

M Slater is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rings, Modules, and Algebras (12 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (12 papers), Mathematics and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (2 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (2 papers) and Functional Equations Stability Results (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (187 citations), Geometry and Topology (132 citations), Applied Mathematics (101 citations), Numerical Analysis (45 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (24 citations). M Slater has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Herbert S. Wilf, Robert C. Thompson, R. D. Driver, Donald J. Newman, David Newman, Irvin Roy Hentzel, D. E. Amos, Leslie Wise, Jonathan Goldstein and A.P. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Number Theory and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact