M. Polée
Impact in
- Oncology top 2%
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
-
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- G. Stoter (5 shared papers)Peter Derk Siersema (5 shared papers)Ate van der Gaast (5 shared papers)Ted A.W. Splinter (3 shared papers)M.E.L. van der Burg (3 shared papers)Ferry A.L.M. Eskens (2 shared papers)T.C. Kok (2 shared papers)H.W. Tilanus (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Oncology (3 papers)European Journal of Cancer (3 papers)BMC Cancer (2 papers)British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Diabetic Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsNorway
In The Last Decade
M. Polée
17 papers receiving 1.5k citations
M. Polée's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Oncology 1.2k
- Surgery 194
- Radiation 33
- Cancer Research 48
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
Countries citing papers authored by M. Polée
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Polée's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Polée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Polée more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Polée
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Polée. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Polée. The network helps show where M. Polée may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Polée, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1124 |
| 2 | 2003 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2026 | 0 |
About M. Polée
M. Polée is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers), Bone health and treatments (1 paper), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (1 paper), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper) and Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.2k citations), Surgery (194 citations), Radiation (33 citations), Cancer Research (48 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations). M. Polée has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include G. Stoter, Peter Derk Siersema, Ate van der Gaast, Ted A.W. Splinter, M.E.L. van der Burg, Ferry A.L.M. Eskens, T.C. Kok, H.W. Tilanus, Jaap Verweij and Wim C.J. Hop. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, BMC Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and Diabetic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.