M. Marks

495 citations
6 papers · 385 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

M. Marks

5 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

M. Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 227
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
  • Rehabilitation 47
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 106
  • Urology 34
Replace Hiroko Kawamura with:
Hiroko Kawamura Japan
Sereina Bodenmann Switzerland
Limin Yang China
Masato Mitome Japan
Stefano Nardone United States
Serena Dittoni Italy
Marlena Juszczak Poland
Raghu Vindlacheruvu United Kingdom
A. Samora United States
Vânia Almeida Portugal
M. Marks relative to Hiroko Kawamura Japan Hiroko Kawamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Hiroko Kawamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Marks. The network helps show where M. Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside M. Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Marks Line = papers co-authored together M. Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1987216
2 1991102
3 199358
4 19887
5
Changes in neurite outgrowth but not in cell division induced by low EMF exposure: influence of field strength and culture conditions on responses in rat PC12 pheochromocytoma cells
20002
6 20250

About M. Marks

M. Marks is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Urology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 6 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Spaceflight effects on biology (1 paper), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (1 paper) and Wound Healing and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (227 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations), Rehabilitation (47 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations) and Urology (34 citations). M. Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Joséphine Arendt, Simon Folkard, M Aldhous, J. English, V. Marks, Charles J. Doillon, Durval C. Costa, Declan Murphy, Christine Franey and Stuart Checkley. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, npj Regenerative Medicine, Ergonomics, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact