M. Jean

1.2k citations
40 papers · 911 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M. Jean

37 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

M. Jean
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Reproductive Medicine 368
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 437
  • Aging 29
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 202
  • Clinical Biochemistry 61
Replace Kou Sueoka with:
Kou Sueoka Japan
Te‐Sha Tsai Australia
Hiroya Goto Japan
Mario Mignini Renzini Italy
TG McEvoy United Kingdom
Pankaj Talwar India
Deirdre Zander‐Fox Australia
Paola Novara Italy
Suzanne Young United States
Y. Monji Japan
M. Jean relative to Kou Sueoka Japan Kou Sueoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kou Sueoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Jean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Jean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Jean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Jean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Jean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Jean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Jean. The network helps show where M. Jean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Jean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Jean Line = papers co-authored together M. Jean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001405
2 2008134
3 201149
4 201340
5 201327
6 201025
7 200825
8 201121
9 201121
10 201121
11 199520
12 201016
13 199213
14 201011
15 201211
16 199310
17
[Role of Fallopian tube in fertilization].
20027
18 20106
19 19996
20 20116

About M. Jean

M. Jean is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (19 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (14 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (14 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (368 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (437 citations), Aging (29 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (202 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (61 citations). M. Jean has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include P. Barrière, Thomas Fréour, Pascale May‐Panloup, Yves Malthièry, Pascal Reynier, Charles J. Morgan, Frédérique Savagner, S. Mirallié, Damien Masson and Thomas Dejoie. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Human Reproduction and Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact