M. J. Stott

6.1k citations
138 papers · 5.0k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

M. J. Stott

138 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

M. J. Stott
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.4k
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.1k
  • Orthodontics 170
  • Materials Chemistry 2.0k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 316
Replace Michael Krüger with:
Michael Krüger United States
J. D. Mackenzie United States
U. Valbusa Italy
Richard F. Haglund United States
Roger Smith United Kingdom
W. J. Siekhaus United States
Jian Sun China
K. Anderko Germany
Stephen H. Garofalini United States
M. Tomozawa United States
M. J. Stott relative to Michael Krüger United States Michael Krüger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Michael Krüger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Stott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Stott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Stott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Stott. The network helps show where M. J. Stott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. J. Stott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. J. Stott Line = papers co-authored together M. J. Stott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980354
2 1980263
3 1969237
4 1976215
5 2003164
6 2002138
7 2005138
8 1974129
9 1973129
10 1976114
11 1975109
12 1973109
13 2008104
14 1974102
15 1988102
16 1972101
17 201296
18 200695
19 200285
20 200375

About M. J. Stott

M. J. Stott is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Organic Chemistry, having authored 138 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (59 papers), Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys (35 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (21 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (18 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (18 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (16 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (15 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.4k citations), Mechanics of Materials (1.1k citations), Orthodontics (170 citations), Materials Chemistry (2.0k citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (316 citations). M. J. Stott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. Zaremba, C.H. Hodges, B. Bergersen, R. Astala, Ángel Rubio, Zoran D. Popović, P Kubica, Lázaro Calderín, L. González and Xilin Yin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical Review A, Physical Review B, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact