M. J. Fields

24 papers receiving 892 citations

Peers

M. J. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 650
  • Reproductive Medicine 119
  • Genetics 408
  • Equine 23
  • Small Animals 92
Replace T. J. Parkinson with:
T. J. Parkinson United Kingdom
D. L. Walters Germany
J. E. Hixon United States
Genowefa Kotwica Poland
W. C. Becker United States
L. G. Moore New Zealand
W.A. Chamley Australia
B. J. McLeod United Kingdom
J.J. Knickerbocker United States
Anita Franczak Poland
M. J. Fields relative to T. J. Parkinson United Kingdom T. J. Parkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T. J. Parkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Fields. The network helps show where M. J. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. J. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. J. Fields Line = papers co-authored together M. J. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001145
2 1996133
3 1979110
4 199691
5 198589
6 199282
7 199068
8 198760
9 199630
10 199225
11 198222
12
Microtympanometry, microscopy and tympanometry in evaluating middle ear effusion prior to myringotomy.
199320
13 200219
14
Contribution of the bovine conceptus to the endocrinological phenomenon existing at implantation, during gestation and around parturition.
198012
15 197910
16 19878
17 19976
18 19936
19 19785
20 19884

About M. J. Fields

M. J. Fields is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Social Psychology, Small Animals, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (15 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (650 citations), Reproductive Medicine (119 citations), Genetics (408 citations), Equine (23 citations) and Small Animals (92 citations). M. J. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Fields, A. C. Warnick, Howard Fischer, Fuller W. Bazer, W.W. Thatcher, Hanns Helmer, C. M. Barros, Otto K. Behrens, Shin-Wen Chang and Anna‐Riitta Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Biology of Reproduction, Journal of Animal Science, Reproduction and Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact