M. Hedberg

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

M. Hedberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Clinical Biochemistry 310
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 60
  • Molecular Medicine 161
  • Periodontics 132
  • Pharmaceutical Science 106
Replace Elwood L. Foltz with:
Elwood L. Foltz United States
Amal J. Fatani Saudi Arabia
Wichai Santimaleeworagun Thailand
Peiyuan Xia China
Ramadan A. El-Domany Egypt
Fumiaki Ikeda Japan
Ghadeer A. R. Y. Suaifan Jordan
William J. Novick United States
Ammar Almaaytah Jordan
J. Van Eldere Belgium
M. Hedberg relative to Elwood L. Foltz United States Elwood L. Foltz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Elwood L. Foltz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Hedberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hedberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hedberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hedberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hedberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hedberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hedberg. The network helps show where M. Hedberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Hedberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Hedberg Line = papers co-authored together M. Hedberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990207
2 2003110
3 2016108
4 2008101
5
ESCMID STUDY GROUP ON ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN ANAEROBIC BACTERIA. ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BACTEROIDES FRAGILIS GROUP ISOLATES IN EUROPE
200387
6 202063
7 200861
8 199559
9 200650
10 199545
11 199634
12 200732
13 200829
14 199228
15 201127
16 199627
17 200026
18 199625
19 201220
20 199520

About M. Hedberg

M. Hedberg is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (7 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (6 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (310 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (60 citations), Molecular Medicine (161 citations), Periodontics (132 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (106 citations). M. Hedberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include C. E. Nord, Nord Ce, Kálmán J. Szabó, K Tunér, Nadia O. Ilchenko, Anders Heimdahl, Hans Sandberg, Per‐Östen Söder, G. Hall and Charlotta Edlund. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Process Research & Development, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact