M. Gladisch

542 citations
27 papers · 386 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M. Gladisch

27 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

M. Gladisch
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Condensed Matter Physics 113
  • Mechanics of Materials 221
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 70
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 167
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 47
Replace H. Schilling with:
H. Schilling Switzerland
M. Camani Switzerland
A. Höfer Germany
P. Sferlazzo United States
W. F. Lankford United States
M. Birke Germany
Jan Mäder Germany
K. G. Tschersich Germany
Mutumi Tuda Japan
P. Birrer Switzerland
M. Gladisch relative to H. Schilling Switzerland H. Schilling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H. Schilling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Gladisch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Gladisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Gladisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Gladisch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Gladisch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Gladisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Gladisch. The network helps show where M. Gladisch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Gladisch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Gladisch Line = papers co-authored together M. Gladisch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198237
2 198034
3 197827
4 198126
5 199123
6 198423
7 198121
8 198619
9 197918
10 198718
11 199017
12 198815
13 198614
14 198412
15 198511
16 197911
17 197910
18 19849
19 19889
20 19868

About M. Gladisch

M. Gladisch is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Spectroscopy and Materials Chemistry, having authored 27 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muon and positron interactions and applications (20 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (6 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (113 citations), Mechanics of Materials (221 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (70 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (167 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (47 citations). M. Gladisch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include H. Orth, D. Herlach, A. Seeger, G. zu Putlitz, P. O. Egan, J. Vetter, V. W. Hughes, Marcus Wigand, A. Badertscher and D. C. Lu. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Hyperfine Interactions, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, Annalen der Physik and Philosophical Magazine Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact