M. E. McBrien

605 citations
15 papers · 313 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. E. McBrien

15 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

M. E. McBrien
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Toxicology 70
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 33
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
  • Emergency Medicine 33
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 76
Replace Brian D. Euerle with:
Brian D. Euerle United States
Oliver Kunitz Germany
Clifford Gevirtz United States
Evan J. Goodman United States
Anil Gupta Sweden
Josh Luftig United States
Elvin Kesimci Türkiye
Federico Geraldini Italy
Anoop Ramgolam Australia
Jaya Ramanathan United States
M. E. McBrien relative to Brian D. Euerle United States Brian D. Euerle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Brian D. Euerle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. McBrien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. McBrien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. McBrien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. McBrien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. McBrien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. McBrien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. McBrien. The network helps show where M. E. McBrien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside M. E. McBrien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. E. McBrien Line = papers co-authored together M. E. McBrien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199686
2 201765
3 200949
4 201825
5 200123
6 200120
7 199511
8 201210
9 19966
10 20015
11
Health promotion--education or marketing strategy?
19864
12
The potential role of the nurse in prevention and early intervention in alcohol misuse.
19834
13 20152
14
Intensive care management of the HELLP syndrome.
19952
15 19961

About M. E. McBrien

M. E. McBrien is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (70 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (33 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations), Emergency Medicine (33 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (76 citations). M. E. McBrien has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. C. McCourt, Daniel F. McAuley, Marissa Shields, C. C. Patterson, Ciara O’Donnell, Mike Clarke, Dara S. Breslin, G. Heyburn, J Elliott and Michael Stevenson. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, Age and Ageing and International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact