M. Dierick

25 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

M. Dierick
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Radiation 87
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 125
  • Pharmacology 90
  • Social Psychology 100
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
Replace Matthias Graw with:
Matthias Graw Germany
Patrizia Moretti Italy
Fabien D. Legrand France
Anthony J. Russo United States
Daniela Morelli Italy
R. D. Murison Australia
Kim Colyvas Australia
Felice Festa Italy
Despina Papadopoulou Greece
B Dubé Canada
M. Dierick relative to Matthias Graw Germany Matthias Graw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Matthias Graw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Dierick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Dierick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Dierick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Dierick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Dierick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Dierick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Dierick. The network helps show where M. Dierick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Dierick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Dierick Line = papers co-authored together M. Dierick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002286
2 200892
3
Mirtazapine is more effective than trazodone: a double-blind controlled study in hospitalized patients with major depression.
199566
4 200546
5 200539
6 200237
7 201237
8 200433
9 201432
10 202029
11 202020
12 202411
13 199710
14 20229
15 20249
16
Treatment of depressive anxiety states associated with psychosomatic symptoms. A double-blind multicentre clinical study: mianserin versus melitracen-flupentixol.
19849
17 19906
18 20246
19 20015
20 19753

About M. Dierick

M. Dierick is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Infectious Diseases and Radiation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Nutrition and Health (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (2 papers) and Geophysical Methods and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (125 citations), Pharmacology (90 citations), Social Psychology (100 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). M. Dierick has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Johan De Smedt, M. Ansseau, Luc Van Hoorebeke, Bert Masschaele, Veerle Cnudde, Eric Cox, Bert Devriendt, Daisy Vanrompay, Stefaan De Neve and P Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gut Microbes and Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact