M. de Wit

1.2k citations
35 papers · 893 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

M. de Wit

33 papers receiving 822 citations

Peers

M. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 324
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 581
  • Water Science and Technology 83
  • Materials Chemistry 241
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 95
Replace B. Malo with:
B. Malo Canada
Neelam Gupta United States
Fuyu Li China
Xia Hua China
Om Prakash India
Naoki Takahashi Japan
F.W.D. Woodhams United Kingdom
Mohammad Yousuf India
M. de Wit relative to B. Malo Canada B. Malo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
B. Malo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. de Wit. The network helps show where M. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together M. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971112
2 197163
3 197163
4 199062
5 196954
6 200944
7 196844
8 199042
9 196939
10 199737
11 196334
12 199332
13 199031
14 200030
15 197429
16 196729
17
Hysteresis and moisture buffering of wood
200523
18 200521
19 199319
20 199918

About M. de Wit

M. de Wit is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Water Science and Technology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (9 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (4 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (3 papers) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (324 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (581 citations), Water Science and Technology (83 citations), Materials Chemistry (241 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (95 citations). M. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include W. C. Holton, R. K. Watts, W. C. Scott, T. L. Estle, J.W. Fattaruso, A. R. Reinberg, Khen-Sang Tan, R.K. Hester, J. Schneider and B. Dischler. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Hydrological Processes, Applied Physics Letters, Hydrology and earth system sciences and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact