M. Chatel
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 20
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 20
-
- Polyamine Metabolism and Applications 6
- Co-authors
- Christine Lebrun‐Frénay (18 shared papers)Pierre Thomas (8 shared papers)Jean-Michel Derlon (4 shared papers)Pierre Bustany (4 shared papers)Françoise Darcel (13 shared papers)J Théron (3 shared papers)Catherine Bourdet (3 shared papers)A. Syrota (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurology (5 papers)Journal of Neuro-Oncology (4 papers)Multiple Sclerosis Journal (2 papers)Journal of Neuroimaging (2 papers)Epilepsia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
M. Chatel
81 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Genetics 566
- Neurology 361
- Psychiatry and Mental health 287
- Cancer Research 203
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 288
Countries citing papers authored by M. Chatel
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Chatel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Chatel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Chatel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Chatel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Chatel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Chatel. The network helps show where M. Chatel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Chatel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 189 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 173 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 158 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 138 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 114 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 104 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 8 | Epidermal growth factor receptor and labeling index are independent prognostic factors in glial tumor outcome. | 1998 | 86 |
| 9 | 2004 | 76 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 62 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 43 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 34 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 20 |
About M. Chatel
M. Chatel is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (7 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (7 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (6 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (566 citations), Neurology (361 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (287 citations), Cancer Research (203 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (288 citations). M. Chatel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christine Lebrun‐Frénay, Pierre Thomas, Jean-Michel Derlon, Pierre Bustany, Françoise Darcel, J Théron, Catherine Bourdet, A. Syrota, A Beaumanoir and Pierre Genton. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of Neuroimaging and Epilepsia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.