M. C. Ip
Impact in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 4
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 3
- Co-authors
- David J. Barker (2 shared papers)Gerta Vrbovà (2 shared papers)K. S. F. Chang (1 shared paper)Gerta Vrbov� (1 shared paper)D. R. Westbury (1 shared paper)Benjamin I. Bearnot (1 shared paper)Daniel Thomas Myran (1 shared paper)Vaughan W. Rees (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Anatomical Record (3 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2 papers)Neuroscience (2 papers)Cell and Tissue Research (1 paper)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. C. Ip
14 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 176
- Neurology 42
- Developmental Neuroscience 18
- Cell Biology 58
- Neurology 42
Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Ip
This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Ip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Ip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Ip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Ip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Ip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Ip. The network helps show where M. C. Ip may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside M. C. Ip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1966 | 192 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1968 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1967 | 5 | |
| 13 | Name Suppression Practices of New Zealand’s Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal 2004-2014. | 2018 | 2 |
| 14 | Practitioner Health Issues Featuring Before New Zealand’s Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal: An Analysis of Cases 2003-2014. | 2018 | 1 |
| 15 | 2019 | 0 |
About M. C. Ip
M. C. Ip is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Pharmacy, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (2 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (176 citations), Neurology (42 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (18 citations), Cell Biology (58 citations) and Neurology (42 citations). M. C. Ip has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Barker, Gerta Vrbovà, K. S. F. Chang, Gerta Vrbov�, D. R. Westbury, Benjamin I. Bearnot, Daniel Thomas Myran, Vaughan W. Rees, Yi‐Lee Wong and Norman Giesbrecht. Their work appears in journals such as The Anatomical Record, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Neuroscience, Cell and Tissue Research and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.