M. C. Bishop

498 citations
19 papers · 347 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Urology top 10%
    • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Papers in

M. C. Bishop

19 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

M. C. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Transplantation 45
  • Urology 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 48
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 62
  • Nephrology 13
Replace Inbar Ben‐Shachar with:
Inbar Ben‐Shachar Israel
Nikolaos P. Karidis Greece
G Niblack United States
Ferguson Rm United States
Hakala Tr United States
Masaki Muramatsu Japan
Riku Hamada Japan
Robert Król Poland
J.L. Gutiérrez Baños Spain
Jakub Zieg Czechia
M. C. Bishop relative to Inbar Ben‐Shachar Israel Inbar Ben‐Shachar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Inbar Ben‐Shachar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Bishop. The network helps show where M. C. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. C. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. C. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together M. C. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2007101
2 198447
3 198525
4 198825
5 199421
6 198418
7 199817
8 200317
9 199016
10 198514
11 198910
12 199410
13 197810
14 19946
15
Impact of cyclosporin on the incidence and prevalence of chronic rejection in renal transplants.
19975
16 19942
17 19931
18 19941
19
Prolonged renal allograft survival in chronic rejection by conversion to triple therapy.
19931

About M. C. Bishop

M. C. Bishop is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Transplantation, Surgery and Nephrology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (45 citations), Urology (38 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (48 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (62 citations) and Nephrology (13 citations). M. C. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R.J. Lemberger, Stéphanie McArdle, Robert C. Rees, C. P. Bates, Ian J. Beckingham, C. Selby, R.W. Blamey, Thomas Elliott, Richard Slack and A G Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Transplant International, European Urology, The Prostate and British Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact