M. Buxton‐Thomas

1.9k citations
48 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

M. Buxton‐Thomas

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

M. Buxton‐Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Gastroenterology 167
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 129
  • Epidemiology 467
  • Neurology 183
  • Hepatology 87
Replace Yueh‐Hsia Chiu with:
Yueh‐Hsia Chiu Taiwan
Joseph Shaker United States
Felix Aigner Austria
Konstantinos S. Mylonas Greece
J Rovenský Slovakia
Mounir Aout France
A. Zielke Germany
Edmund K. Li Hong Kong
I D Griffiths United Kingdom
H. D. Röher Germany
M. Buxton‐Thomas relative to Yueh‐Hsia Chiu Taiwan Yueh‐Hsia Chiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Yueh‐Hsia Chiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Buxton‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Buxton‐Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Buxton‐Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Buxton‐Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Buxton‐Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Buxton‐Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Buxton‐Thomas. The network helps show where M. Buxton‐Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Buxton‐Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Buxton‐Thomas Line = papers co-authored together M. Buxton‐Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997307
2 2009225
3 199996
4 200995
5 200088
6 200366
7 199864
8 200761
9 198456
10 200555
11 199740
12 200438
13 199235
14 200233
15 198431
16
Use of neural networks in brain SPECT to diagnose Alzheimer's disease.
199630
17 197926
18 200522
19 199618
20 200415

About M. Buxton‐Thomas

M. Buxton‐Thomas is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Hepatology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (4 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (167 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (129 citations), Epidemiology (467 citations), Neurology (183 citations) and Hepatology (87 citations). M. Buxton‐Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Caje Moniz, Ingvar Bjarnason, I Forgács, Andrew J. Macpherson, Peter Watkins, Robert H. Whitaker, John Ramage, E R Howard, Michael Edmonds and Brian Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine Communications, British Journal of Radiology, Diabetic Medicine, Gut and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact