Lynette E Denny

51 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Lynette E Denny's Hit Papers

Cervical cancer 2019 · 1.8k citations
1.8k0+2+4Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Lynette E Denny
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 470
  • Epidemiology 2.0k
  • Microbiology 305
  • Cancer Research 373
  • Oncology 668
Replace Philip E. Castle with:
Philip E. Castle United States
Toshiyuki Sasagawa Japan
Magdalena Grce Croatia
J Peto United Kingdom
Fang-Hui Zhao China
Anne F. Rositch United States
Albert Singer United Kingdom
Stuart I. Collins United Kingdom
Ana Félix Portugal
David Mesher United Kingdom
Lynette E Denny relative to Philip E. Castle United States Philip E. Castle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Philip E. Castle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynette E Denny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynette E Denny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynette E Denny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynette E Denny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynette E Denny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynette E Denny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynette E Denny. The network helps show where Lynette E Denny may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lynette E Denny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynette E Denny Line = papers co-authored together Lynette E Denny links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cervical cancer
Hit paper breakdown →
20191832
2 2005303
3 2008228
4 2005166
5 2015157
6 2010144
7 2006109
8 2010102
9 2012101
10 201174
11 200567
12 200158
13 200657
14 200055
15 201551
16 202045
17 201644
18 200642
19 200538
20 200038

About Lynette E Denny

Lynette E Denny is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Microbiology, Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (37 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers), Genital Health and Disease (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (5 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (5 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (470 citations), Epidemiology (2.0k citations), Microbiology (305 citations), Cancer Research (373 citations) and Oncology (668 citations). Lynette E Denny has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Andrew Cohen, Ana Oaknin, Anjua Jhingran, Louise Kuhn, Thomas C. Wright, Amy E. Pollack, Michelle De Souza, William B. Dupree, Wei‐Yann Tsai and Rose Ihuoma Anorlu. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, International Journal of Cancer, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Immunology and Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact