Lydia E. Gill

617 citations
13 papers · 416 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lydia E. Gill

13 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Lydia E. Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Health 68
  • Pharmacy 29
  • Physiology 119
  • General Health Professions 73
Replace Angela Devereux‐Fitzgerald with:
Angela Devereux‐Fitzgerald United Kingdom
Ruth Ann Carpenter United States
Tanya J. Benitez United States
Diana Lattimore United States
Diana Dill United States
Marie Clark United Kingdom
Anne Dewhurst United Kingdom
Jeffrey Lambert United Kingdom
Shawn K. Jeffries United States
Sławomir Czachowski Poland
Lydia E. Gill relative to Angela Devereux‐Fitzgerald United Kingdom Angela Devereux‐Fitzgerald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Angela Devereux‐Fitzgerald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lydia E. Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia E. Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia E. Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia E. Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia E. Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia E. Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia E. Gill. The network helps show where Lydia E. Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Lydia E. Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lydia E. Gill Line = papers co-authored together Lydia E. Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2016113
2 201580
3 201647
4 201746
5 201626
6 201521
7 201621
8 201619
9 201718
10 201718
11
Child and Adolescent Health in Western Australia: An Overview
19993
12
Specific Child and Adolescent Health Problems in Western Australia
19992
13
The Paradox of Scarcity in a Land of Plenty: Meeting the Needs of Older Adults with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders.
20142

About Lydia E. Gill

Lydia E. Gill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Applied Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers) and Health, Medicine and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (43 citations), Health (68 citations), Pharmacy (29 citations), Physiology (119 citations) and General Health Professions (73 citations). Lydia E. Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cameroon and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Bartels, John A. Batsis, John Eckenrode, Deinera Exner‐Cortens, John A. Naslund, Rebecca Masutani, Francisco Lopez‐Jimenez, Pamela J. Bagley, Heather B. Blunt and Anna M. Adachi‐Mejia. Their work appears in journals such as Aggression and Violent Behavior, Journal of Mental Health, Current Obesity Reports, Psychiatric Quarterly and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact