Luting Chen

935 citations
20 papers · 670 · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Luting Chen

16 papers receiving 649 citations

Luting Chen's Hit Papers

Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model 2019 · 428 citations
4280+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Luting Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Information Systems and Management 240
  • Management Information Systems 260
  • Reproductive Medicine 58
  • Marketing 64
  • Demography 72
Replace Se Hun Lim with:
Se Hun Lim South Korea
Helen Bruce United Kingdom
Ahmad Daragmeh Hungary
Emmanuel Awuni Kolog Ghana
Mohamed Ragab Ireland
Ahmed M. Mutahar Malaysia
Sevenpri Candra Indonesia
Aries Susanto Indonesia
Yongqing Yang China
Shunbo Yuan China
Luting Chen relative to Se Hun Lim South Korea Se Hun Lim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Se Hun Lim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luting Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luting Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luting Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luting Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luting Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luting Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luting Chen. The network helps show where Luting Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luting Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luting Chen Line = papers co-authored together Luting Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Hit paper breakdown →
2019428
2 202056
3 201447
4 202234
5 201416
6 201416
7 202215
8 201411
9 202110
10 201410
11 20209
12 20237
13 20235
14 20174
15 20241
16 20131
17 20240
18 20250
19 20240
20 20230

About Luting Chen

Luting Chen is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Immunology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (240 citations), Management Information Systems (260 citations), Reproductive Medicine (58 citations), Marketing (64 citations) and Demography (72 citations). Luting Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Thailand and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include HU Zhong-qing, Shizheng Li, Shanlin Yang, Shuai Ding, He‐Feng Huang, Jiahao Wu, Fan Qu, Yan Li, Jian Zhang and Yanting Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Displays, Cell Proliferation, Reproductive Health and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact