Lukas Rier

547 citations
18 papers · 256 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lukas Rier

15 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Lukas Rier
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 131
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 162
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 77
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 19
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 36
Replace Laurence A. Coles with:
Laurence A. Coles United Kingdom
Kaiyan He China
Cody Doyle United Kingdom
Christoph Pfeiffer Sweden
David Woolger United Kingdom
Tony R. Carter United States
Rasmus Zetter Finland
Amir Borna United States
S. Biber Germany
Kuniomi Ogata Japan
Lukas Rier relative to Laurence A. Coles United Kingdom Laurence A. Coles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Laurence A. Coles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas Rier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas Rier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas Rier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas Rier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas Rier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas Rier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas Rier. The network helps show where Lukas Rier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukas Rier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas Rier Line = papers co-authored together Lukas Rier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202267
2 202349
3 202338
4 202419
5 202118
6 202113
7 202413
8 202210
9 20239
10 20228
11 20246
12 20252
13 20252
14 20231
15 20241
16 20250
17 20250
18 20250

About Lukas Rier

Lukas Rier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Automotive Engineering and Epidemiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (12 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (1 paper) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (131 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (162 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (77 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (19 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (36 citations). Lukas Rier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Brookes, Ryan M. Hill, Niall Holmes, Vishal Shah, James Osborne, Richard Bowtell, Elena Boto, Natalie Rhodes, Molly Rea and James Leggett. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, eLife, NeuroImage Clinical, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact