Cody Doyle
Impact in
-
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 11
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 4
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
-
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research 9
- Co-authors
- Elena Boto (10 shared papers)Ryan M. Hill (10 shared papers)Richard W Bowtell (8 shared papers)Vishal K. Shah (10 shared papers)James Osborne (10 shared papers)Matthew J. Brookes (10 shared papers)Niall Holmes (10 shared papers)Molly Rea (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- NeuroImage (2 papers)eLife (2 papers)NeuroImage Clinical (1 paper)Contemporary Physics (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Cody Doyle
11 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 239
- Cognitive Neuroscience 138
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 19
- Neurology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Cody Doyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Cody Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cody Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cody Doyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cody Doyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cody Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cody Doyle. The network helps show where Cody Doyle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Cody Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 139 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Cody Doyle
Cody Doyle is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Neurology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (239 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (107 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (19 citations) and Neurology (7 citations). Cody Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Elena Boto, Ryan M. Hill, Richard W Bowtell, Vishal K. Shah, James Osborne, Matthew J. Brookes, Niall Holmes, Molly Rea, Natalie Rhodes and James Leggett. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, eLife, NeuroImage Clinical, Contemporary Physics and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.