Luka Lešnik

27 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Luka Lešnik
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 277
  • Automotive Engineering 109
  • Biomedical Engineering 272
  • Computational Mechanics 113
  • Mechanical Engineering 100
Replace Thanh Danh Le with:
Thanh Danh Le Vietnam
Aleš Hribernik Slovenia
Muhammad Ali Ijaz Malik Pakistan
Adrian Clenci Romania
Alfonso Horrillo Spain
Nur Atiqah Ramlan Malaysia
Bilal Aydoğan Türkiye
Fengyu Li China
Balaji Subramanian India
J. Arroyo Spain
Luka Lešnik relative to Thanh Danh Le Vietnam Thanh Danh Le's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Thanh Danh Le · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luka Lešnik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luka Lešnik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luka Lešnik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luka Lešnik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luka Lešnik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luka Lešnik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luka Lešnik. The network helps show where Luka Lešnik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Luka Lešnik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luka Lešnik Line = papers co-authored together Luka Lešnik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013108
2 201473
3 201834
4 201530
5 201828
6 202023
7 201917
8 202217
9 201417
10 202315
11 201812
12 202111
13 202110
14 20218
15 20175
16 20225
17 20204
18 20234
19 20223
20 20223

About Luka Lešnik

Luka Lešnik is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Automotive Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (11 papers), Biodiesel Production and Applications (9 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (5 papers), Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (5 papers), Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps (5 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (4 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (3 papers) and Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (277 citations), Automotive Engineering (109 citations), Biomedical Engineering (272 citations), Computational Mechanics (113 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (100 citations). Luka Lešnik has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Spain and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Breda Kegl, Ignacijo Biluš, Leopold Škerget, Zoran Žunič, Eloísa Torres-Jiménez, Aleš Hribernik, Fernando Cruz-Peragón, Marko Hočevar, Matevž Dular and Octavio Armas. Their work appears in journals such as Fuel, Sustainability, Energy Conversion and Management, Energies and Ultrasonics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact