Luísa Pedro

17 papers receiving 126 citations

Peers

Luísa Pedro
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 7
  • Pollution 20
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 7
  • Health 12
Replace Meidi Shen with:
Meidi Shen China
Kezhi Jin China
Asma Alrushud Saudi Arabia
Flora Ma United States
Sara Carbone Italy
Linqi Xu China
Joey Wong Canada
Charles J. Fountaine United States
Debra Kellstedt United States
Alyssa Lubet United States
Luísa Pedro relative to Meidi Shen China Meidi Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Meidi Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luísa Pedro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luísa Pedro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luísa Pedro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luísa Pedro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luísa Pedro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luísa Pedro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luísa Pedro. The network helps show where Luísa Pedro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luísa Pedro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luísa Pedro Line = papers co-authored together Luísa Pedro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201330
2 201428
3 201524
4 201217
5 201411
6 20084
7 20143
8 20103
9 20173
10 20202
11 20251
12
Revisão de instrumentos de qualidade de vida na esclerose múltipla
20061
13 20141
14
The perceived stigma of the disease on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis
20111
15
Qualidade de vida em doentes crónicos portugueses
20161
16
Estrutura da boa vida em pessoas com doença crónica
20101
17
Qualidade de vida e espiritualidade em seis doenças crónicas
20131
18 20141
19 20210
20 20220

About Luísa Pedro

Luísa Pedro is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 23 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Education Pedagogy and Practices (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (17 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (7 citations), Pollution (20 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (7 citations) and Health (12 citations). Luísa Pedro has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include José Luís Pais Ribeiro, Rute F. Meneses, Denisa Mendonça, Isabel Silva, Helena Cardoso, Estela Vilhena, Susana C. Marques, António Martins da Silva, Luís M. S. Dias and Ava Lorenc. Their work appears in journals such as Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Public Health, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Spanish Journal of Psychology and IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact