Ludger Witte

7.2k citations
182 papers · 5.2k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Ludger Witte

182 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Ludger Witte
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
  • Pharmacology 455
  • Plant Science 1.9k
  • Biotechnology 430
  • Insect Science 485
Replace Emilio L. Ghisalberti with:
Emilio L. Ghisalberti Australia
David S. Seigler United States
Anna Andolfi Italy
David R. Gang United States
Dieter Strack Germany
Jürgen Schmidt Germany
Toni M. Kutchan Germany
Geoffrey C. Kite United Kingdom
Masaharu Mizutani Japan
Francisco A. Macı́as Spain
Ludger Witte relative to Emilio L. Ghisalberti Australia Emilio L. Ghisalberti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Emilio L. Ghisalberti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ludger Witte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ludger Witte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludger Witte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludger Witte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ludger Witte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludger Witte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludger Witte. The network helps show where Ludger Witte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ludger Witte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ludger Witte Line = papers co-authored together Ludger Witte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 182 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995253
2 1985164
3 1992123
4 1997108
5 199499
6 199193
7 199692
8 199285
9 198284
10 198478
11 199577
12 199673
13 199372
14 198772
15 199372
16 199771
17 198368
18 199563
19 201759
20 198759

About Ludger Witte

Ludger Witte is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 182 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botanical Research and Chemistry (91 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (43 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (39 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (30 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (17 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (14 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (14 papers) and Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.2k citations), Pharmacology (455 citations), Plant Science (1.9k citations), Biotechnology (430 citations) and Insect Science (485 citations). Ludger Witte has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Egypt and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Wink, Victor Wray, Thomas Hartmann, Peter Proksch, Tobias Hartmann, Roland Greinwald, RuAngelie Edrada‐Ebel, Jochen Berlin, Claudine Theuring and Ludger Ernst. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact