Lucy Chow
Impact in
-
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jane Arboleda (2 shared papers)John Crown (2 shared papers)Charles Ginther (2 shared papers)Dennis J. Slamon (1 shared paper)Neil A. O’Brien (1 shared paper)Michael J. Duffy (1 shared paper)Brigid C. Browne (1 shared paper)Norma O’Donovan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)The Prostate (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Lucy Chow
13 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Oncology 209
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 115
- Immunology and Allergy 26
- Genetics 41
- Molecular Biology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Lucy Chow
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucy Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucy Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucy Chow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucy Chow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucy Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucy Chow. The network helps show where Lucy Chow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lucy Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 249 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 0 |
About Lucy Chow
Lucy Chow is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (1 paper) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (209 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (115 citations), Immunology and Allergy (26 citations), Genetics (41 citations) and Molecular Biology (162 citations). Lucy Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jane Arboleda, John Crown, Charles Ginther, Dennis J. Slamon, Neil A. O’Brien, Michael J. Duffy, Brigid C. Browne, Norma O’Donovan, Yuhua Wang and Albert G. Frauman. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, The Prostate and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.