Loring M. Danforth

1.4k citations
35 papers · 831 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
    • Philippine History and Culture
    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Balkans: History, Politics, Society

Papers in

Loring M. Danforth

23 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Loring M. Danforth
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Anthropology 274
  • Cultural Studies 148
  • Space and Planetary Science 15
  • Music 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 361
Replace C. Nadia Seremetakis with:
C. Nadia Seremetakis United States
Frances E. Mascia‐Lees United States
Richard Huntington United States
Louis-Vincent Thomas France
Diana L. Eck United States
Francisco Ferrándiz Spain
Devon A. Mihesuah United States
Bernard Giesen Germany
carol duncan United States
Mary Nooter Roberts United States
Loring M. Danforth relative to C. Nadia Seremetakis United States C. Nadia Seremetakis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Nadia Seremetakis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loring M. Danforth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loring M. Danforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loring M. Danforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loring M. Danforth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loring M. Danforth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loring M. Danforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loring M. Danforth. The network helps show where Loring M. Danforth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Loring M. Danforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loring M. Danforth Line = papers co-authored together Loring M. Danforth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995160
2 1984160
3 1990110
4 1983104
5 198355
6 198442
7 200139
8 199330
9 199625
10 199718
11 201617
12 198312
13 201111
14 19768
15 19796
16 19946
17 20034
18 20033
19 19963
20 19853

About Loring M. Danforth

Loring M. Danforth is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Balkans: History, Politics, Society (9 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), European Politics and Security (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (2 papers) and Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (274 citations), Cultural Studies (148 citations), Space and Planetary Science (15 citations), Music (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (361 citations). Loring M. Danforth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Loïzos, Demetrios J. Constantelos and Robert Legvold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of modern Greek studies, Diaspora A Journal of Transnational Studies, American Ethnologist, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies and Anthropology Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact