Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies

524 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 524 papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies usually cover Classics (286 papers), Anthropology (185 papers) and Archeology (156 papers) specifically the topics of Byzantine Studies and History (284 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (110 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies are Liz James, Ruth Macrides, Margaret Alexiou, Archibald Dunn, Peter Mackridge, Roderick Beaton, Dionysios Stathakopoulos, Leslie Brubaker, John Haldon and Paul Magdalino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025