Long Kim

32 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Long Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 152
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 40
  • Information Systems and Management 69
  • Marketing 46
  • Social Psychology 35
Replace Tran Nhu Quan with:
Tran Nhu Quan Vietnam
Ipang Sasono Indonesia
Adnan M. Rawashdeh Jordan
Amir Gulzar Pakistan
Gusli Chidir Indonesia
Man-Li Gu Malaysia
Denghua Yuan China
Alex Winarno Indonesia
Bob Foster Indonesia
Long Kim relative to Tran Nhu Quan Vietnam Tran Nhu Quan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Tran Nhu Quan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Long Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Long Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Long Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Long Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Long Kim. The network helps show where Long Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Long Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Long Kim Line = papers co-authored together Long Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202232
2
Key Determinants on Switching Intention in Cambodian Banking Market
202121
3 202320
4 202217
5 202116
6 202315
7 202415
8 202414
9 202411
10 202310
11 202410
12
Understanding Customer Trust in Latex Glove Industry: Evidence from Thai Customers
20219
13 20229
14 20248
15 20236
16 20235
17 20235
18 20245
19 20245
20 20255

About Long Kim

Long Kim is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (16 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (14 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Employee Performance and Management (5 papers), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence (5 papers) and Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (152 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (40 citations), Information Systems and Management (69 citations), Marketing (46 citations) and Social Psychology (35 citations). Long Kim has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, Malaysia and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Sook Fern Yeo, Pattarawadee Maijan, Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp, Prof Vikas Kumar, Sangwon Lee, Narinthon Imjai, Somnuk Aujirapongpan, Sydney Chinchanachokchai, Mukhamad Najib and Cheng Ling Tan. Their work appears in journals such as ABAC Journal, Sustainable Futures, Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, Heliyon and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact