Lois E. McCarthy

654 citations
10 papers · 543 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lois E. McCarthy

10 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Lois E. McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 264
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Virology 44
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 27
  • Neurology 55
Replace Clayton A. Wiley with:
Clayton A. Wiley United States
Adelina Holguin United States
Norma C. Alonzo United States
L. Ehrlich Germany
Raeesa Gupte United States
Jacqueline A. Hubbard United States
Ana Borrajo Spain
Michael T. Nedelcovych United States
Nicole A. Northrop United States
Shuxian Hu United States
Lois E. McCarthy relative to Clayton A. Wiley United States Clayton A. Wiley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Clayton A. Wiley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lois E. McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lois E. McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lois E. McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lois E. McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lois E. McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lois E. McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lois E. McCarthy. The network helps show where Lois E. McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lois E. McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lois E. McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Lois E. McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001322
2 200491
3 200429
4 200127
5 200526
6 200312
7 198812
8 20049
9 20069
10 20066

About Lois E. McCarthy

Lois E. McCarthy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Chemokine receptors and signaling (2 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (264 citations), Biological Psychiatry (31 citations), Virology (44 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (27 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Lois E. McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Rogers, Michele A. Wetzel, Toby K. Eisenstein, Mark Walzer, Philipp J. Kahle, Benjamin Wolozin, Mark Frasier, Debra J. Magnuson, Carola A. Haas and Michelle E. Ehrlich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroimmunology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, genesis, Experimental Neurology and Developmental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact